His belief – described by many as “excessive” – has set his sights on the legal system of the state of Colorado. To us.
Rogel Aguilera-MederosA 26-year-old Cuban man has been sentenced to life in prison 110 years in prison In a traffic accident in 2019, four people were killed when a truck carrying trees lined with cars he was driving collided with it, causing a fire.
See: A Hispanic trucker has been sentenced to 110 years in prison in the United States for killing four people.
Lakewood Police Department investigators say Aguilera-Mederos was not under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time of the crash and has no criminal record.
The defense alleges that the truck’s brakes failed, but he was prosecuted for not using emergency depressions to prevent the tragedy.
As a result of the accident, Miguel Angel Lamas Arelano, 24, lost their lives; William Bailey, 67; Doyle Harrison, 61, and Stanley Politano, 69, were among the other injured.
The sentencing of Aguilera-Madero provoked the solidarity of millions of people who committed crimes that are considered more serious by justice than many other criminals in other parts of the United States and led to lawsuits seeking its reconsideration. .
Last Friday, Alexis King, Colorado’s first District Attorney, filed a lawsuit in court seeking a new trial to reconsider the sentence.
“This case must be convicted under Colorado law, and the law allows the court to reconsider its sentence in an exceptional case involving unusual and protracted circumstances,” the attorney wrote.
The charity petition for the young man was highly received on the Change.org site 4.600.000 Signatures as of this Wednesday, it is one of the three most signed applications in 2021 and one of the fastest growing according to company data.
There have been at least two demonstrations this week in front of the Colorado Congress, and many truckers have announced on social media that they will not use state highways in solidarity with Aguilera-Metro.
The case has received significant attention not only because of the media attention and protests, but also because celebrities have talked about it.
Mars is the true star Kim Kardashian He released a message of solidarity with Aguilera-Maduro on his networks, joining his voice with the voices of numerous legal experts and activists who condemned the calls. Compulsory minimum sentence,They sentenced Aguilera-Mederos to 110 years in prison.
“The mandatory minimum judicial option removes and must be eliminated,” he wrote. “Colorado’s laws really need to change.”
Kardashian recalled how the judge of the case recognized that he did not want to impose such a long sentence on the young man, but state laws did not allow him to reduce it to his liking.
“What I mean is, if I had the wisdom, it would not be my punishment,” Judge A. said. Bruce Jones said.
But how do you explain this lengthy sentence, and how is it possible that a judge does not have the right to administer justice in certain parts of the United States?
What is the mandatory minimum?
As explained by NGO families against mandatory minimums, these types of penalties are usually established by the US Congress or state legislatures, and imply that the court should impose a minimum sentence on the offender regardless of the individual characteristics of the offender. Or crime.
The Brennan Center for Justice The New York University Law School points out that when these laws were created they were intended to promote uniformity: no matter how strict or soft the judges are, it is only the law and the law that determines a person’s sentence. Condemnation.
“States were followed, and compulsory minimums soon became a constant response to drug and crime epidemics. The effort that began with the good intention of enforcing consistency was highly restricted, creating new inequalities and injustices in the process.” , Indicates.
These types of laws have been in use in some states since the 1950s, although after 1984 their use changed frequently after the Penal Reform Act was passed.
However, many legal and civil rights organizations have called into question its effectiveness over the years.
“Unfortunately, the adoption of compulsory minimum rules did not lead to a fair system. In fact, it had the opposite effect. .
In most states, these types of penalties are related to drug offenses, but in others, such as Colorado, the laws are stricter and apply to other charges.
In addition, Colorado laws require that the minimum sentence for certain offenses be at least 10 years and that sentences not be given simultaneously but continuously.
In the Aguilera-Mederos case, the jury found the teenager guilty of six counts of aggravated assault in the first degree; 10 counts of first-degree attack attempt “with extreme negligence”; Two counts of vehicle attack; Irresponsible driving fees; Four people were killed for reckless driving.
This means that the mandatory minimum sentence has reached 110 years and the judge is reluctant to reduce it considering the possible mitigation factors of the case.
What is the current status of the case?
Following Friday’s request, the prosecution filed another petition on Tuesday seeking to expedite the process for a new investigation.
The prosecutor asked, “Now that the defendant has been convicted, the court is planning a retrial soon after receiving the document.”
According to local media, new visitors may be scheduled soon this Friday or next Monday, although delays may be due to the Christmas and New Year holidays.
The prosecution further indicated that it would like to present further information prior to the hearing.
This Wednesday, the Colorado governor’s office confirmed to BBC Mundo that it had received a request for clemency from Aguilera-Medero’s security and that it was being investigated.
“We have received a request from Rogel Aguilera-Mederos and our legal team is currently reviewing it. Once we make a decision, we will issue a notice,” said government spokesman Conor Cahill.
Last week, the Denver Post newspaper dedicated an editorial to the case and described the sentence as “extremely harsh”.
“We are losing faith in the American judiciary. Mercy is a way to ensure that the standards of justice are balanced,” he said.
How was the accident?
On April 25, 2019, Aguilera-Medero lost control of a freight truck driving down the Interstate 70 near a shopping center in West Denver.
As confirmed by investigators in this case, the truck’s brakes began to overheat on a steep descent, and Aguilera-Maduros continued on his way despite seeing smoke coming from them.
As the truck’s brakes completely failed, Aguilera-Mederos avoided the accident by not using the emergency lane to stop the vehicle, instead the truck collided with several vehicles parked between states due to the accident. Area.
According to Aguilera-Mederos, the young man “thought he was going to die, so he closed his eyes before colliding with a parked vehicle.”
Proponents of her case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online.
Upon hearing the sentence, the young truck driver cried and apologized to the victim’s family.
“I’m not guilty. I’m not a murderer. When we see the charge against us we are talking about a murderer. It’s not me.
“I lost my brakes. Truckers know this is a tough time. You can do nothing. You can do nothing.”
Some of the relatives of the victims have expressed solidarity with the young man, while others consider the sentence to be justified.
Duan Bailey, brother of one of the dead, told The Denver Post: “Trucker deliberately and deliberately decided that his life was more important than anyone on the road that day.”
During the sentencing hearing, Judge A.J. Bruce Jones said he “accepted and respects” what the defendant said about not intending to kill the victims of the accident. “.
* With a statement by Raphael Rojas
This may be of interest to you
“Travel aficionado. Infuriatingly humble reader. Incurable internet specialist.”