The Inter-American Court receives evidence during the trial of this case. Ecuador
On Monday, June 14, 2021, Emilio Palacio Urutia, a former commentator for Diorio El Universo, told the judges of the Human Rights Court (US Court of Human Rights) of the difficult moments he lived. In a “forced deportation” in Miami, USA, in August 2011, in the midst of a rapid criminal process, Ecuador’s president, Rafael, backed Korea, filed a lawsuit against him, and against executives of a media and newspaper production company.
Ten years after leaving his country and unable to work as a journalist, Palacio hopes to achieve from him something he did not achieve in Ecuador during the first two days of trial in a US court: Justice.
His case, Palacio said, turned out to be a persecution and an unequal struggle. “Korea had a personal issue with me, but also a political issue. He had to show that a communication law he submitted was necessary for popular advice. ”
“Journalist Fosto Valdiviso was assassinated, Air Force General George Cabella was assassinated three months before my trial for condemning corruption in the purchase of helicopters, and lawyer Galo Siriboca began an investigation because he said I was the intelligent teacher of the 30’s. There were killings and I realized what he was playing: I’m leaving Ecuador or they are killing me, that’s why I left, ”said Palacio.
In the United States he did not work in his profession, which is thanks to the work of his eldest son and his wife, who in addition received assistance from the North American government for food asylum and health insurance. He tried to continue to comment from abroad, but was never funded in Ecuador because, he said, there was “fear” from advertisers in the country. In the United States, the compensation given to him by the media when he resigned and the resources he saved throughout his life were spent.
When the case reaches the Inter-American Tribunal, it is considered to be the last stage of the process, which began at the Inter – American Commission on Human Rights.
The IACHR’s Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression Pedro Waka Villarreal pointed out that the investigation began precisely with a summary of the case, and that the event was over. Rights infringed Due to the ambiguity and breadth of the articles of the penal code used in this case, the imposition of a severe sentence and the exaggerated civil sanction (40 million) imposed against the victims created unnecessary and apparently unequal sanctions.
At the right time, Ambaro Esparza, on behalf of the Ecuadorian Attorney General’s Office, said the government had recognized that his rights had been violated. But Palacio replied that nothing had changed in Ecuador and that the documents appearing in the international process did not talk about compensation and that it was not just financial compensation. “Korea said it was not obligated to comply with the commission’s directives and demanded changes in the DT system with Venezuela. H. Korea’s apology, after the sentence, did not help me much. In Ecuador I am still guilty of one crime ”.
La Corte I.T.H. I learned about this process after a sentence was passed in Ecuador against the directors of this newspaper, Carlos, Caesar and Nicolas Perez, and former commentator Emilio Palacio sued then-President Rafael Correa.
Former President Palacio has been sued for contempt of court for contributing editors to ‘No a Los Mendiras’ (released February 6, 2011) and directors of EL UNIVERSO. In his article, Palacio refers to the 30S police uprising. The Ecuadorian judiciary ruled in favor of Korea in the first and second cases. (I)